English
Structure
Greek and
Latin. None of this classical lexis was found in Old English, of course - it
has entered English from the Renaissance onwards, most of it in comparatively
modern times, thanks to its extensive use in science.
Some of the language
categories of traditional grammar have more coherence than others. Nouns and
verbs are fairly coherent, while adverbs (or all the words classed by
lexicographers as such) are certainly not.
If you have any
comments or suggestions about the guide, please contact me.
We can study
the structure of language in a variety of ways. For example, we can study
- classes of
words (parts of speech),
- meanings
of words (semantics), with or without considering changes of meaning,
- how words
are organised in relation to each other (syntax),
- how words
are formed (morphology),
- the sounds
of words (phonology) and
- how
written forms represent these (lexicography).
There is no
universally accepted model for doing this, but some models use the notion of
ahierarchy, and this may prove fruitful for you. The framework (description of
structure) you will study here is written to be comprehensive yet succinct.
Elsewhere, in studying language theory, you will focus on a selective area, and
investigate this in more detail.
The most basic
units of meaning are simple words (e.g.: dog, yes and swim) or
the elements of complex words (e.g.: un-
-happi- and -ness in unhappiness). These basic elements are
called morphemes, and the study of how they are combined in words
ismorphology.
The study of
how words are organised into phrases,
clauses and sentences is usually referred to as syntax.
A longer
stretch of language is known as discourse, the study of its structure
as discourse analysis.
This hierarchy
is partly explained by the table below, from David Crystal's The Cambridge
Encyclopedia of Language. The right hand column should be read upwards, in the
direction of the arrow.
|
sentences
are analysed into clauses are analysed into phrases are analysed into words are analysed into morphemes |
↓ ↑
|
sentences
are used to build clauses are used to build phrases are used to build words are used to build morphemes |
The following
table shows a three-part model of the structure of English.
|
Three-part
model of English
|
||
|
Morphology
|
Syntax
|
Discourse
|
|
morphemes
↓
words
|
phrases
↓
clauses
↓
sentences
|
relationships
between sentences in longer stretches of language
|
This is the
study of the structure of words. The name comes from
Greek morphos (=shape or form). The smallest units of meaning may be
whole simple words (e.g. man, run, big) or parts of complex words
(e.g. un-, -faith- and -ful in unfaithful) which are
called morphemes.
Some morphemes,
such
as faith in un-faith-ful or dream in dream-ing can
stand alone as words which make sense. These are known
as free morphemes. You will see how very many simple words are free
morphemes, but can combine with other morphemes, both free and bound (see
below) to form complex words.
Where two
simple words are joined together to form a new complete word, this is called
acompound word. Examples include teapot, starlight and careworn.
When these terms are first coined, they are shown in some dictionaries with a
hyphen, as light-house or fish-finger.
Other
morphemes, such as prefixes and suffixes (collectively
called affixes), cannot stand alone - they need to be part of a complex
word to make sense. Examples are dis- in dis-miss,
dis-pute or dis-grace, -ing in dream-ing, -ness in happi-ness or sad-ness and
even -sused to form plurals, as in boy-s or horse-s. These
morphemes are said to be boundmorphemes.
Bound morphemes
are traditionally divided into two further classes. Sometimes a word is changed
in its form to show the internal grammar of a sentence
(&#quot;agreement&#quot;). Examples would be plural forms of nouns (dog
+ s → dog-s) or past (imperfect) tenses
of regular verbs (want + ed → want-ed). The
study of such changes is inflectional morphology (because the words
in question are inflected - altered by adding a suffix).
Other compound
or complex words are made by adding together elements without reference to the
internal grammar of a sentence. For example, the verb infect suggests
a new verb disinfect (=to undo the action of infecting). New
words are often formed by noun +-ize, noun + ism, or verb
+ able (scandalize, Stalinism, disposable). The
study of such words, "derived" from existing words or morphemes
is derivational morphology. The elements of which the word is made may
have a grammatical relationship within the word(you may find this idea
difficult), but their formation is independent of the syntax of the clause or
sentence in which they occur. If you find this puzzling, two things may help:
- Inflectional
morphology is much easier to recognize. A relatively small
number of types of inflection (showing number or tense, say) covers most
cases.
- All compound
and most complex words show derivational morphology. If a
complex word does not show inflection it will show
derivation.
But note: a complex
word may show both inflection and derivation! A derived
word may be inflected to show, for example, tense or number: deported or disposables (as
in nappies or diapers).
|
Inflection of
nouns, verbs and qualifiers
|
||
|
Nouns
|
Verbs
|
Adjectives
and adverbs
|
|
Addition of
terminal s to show plural (one cat; two cats);
Addition
of 's to show possession (Henry's cat).
|
Ending shows
tense (wanted) or person ([she] wants).
|
Addition
of -er → comparative
(hotter; likelier);
Addition
of -est → superlative (coldest;
soonest).
|
|
Derivational
morphology in complex words
|
|||
|
Prefix
|
Base of Word
|
Suffix
|
Complex Word
|
|
Bi
|
cycl(e)
|
ing
|
Bicycling
|
|
Dis
|
grace
|
ful
|
Disgraceful
|
|
In
|
tolera(te)
|
able
|
Intolerable
|
|
Re
|
vision
|
ist
|
Revisionist
|
|
Un, co
|
operat(e)
|
ive, ly
|
Uncooperatively
|
|
Un
|
likely
(y becomes i)
|
hood
|
Unlikelihood
|
Remember that
morphology is the study of the structure of words. The structure of words can
also be studied to show how the meaning of a given morpheme, or its relation to
the rest of the word, varies from one complex word to another. Consider
how sun works in the following words: sunbeam, sunburnt, sundial,
sunflower, sunglasses, sunlight, sunrise, sun-spot (scientific
sense), sun-spot (tourist sense), suntan.
Inflection does
not really yield “new” words, but alters the form of existing ones for specific
reasons of grammar. Derivation, on the other hand, does lead to the creation of
new words. David Crystal (Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language; p. 90) lists four
normal processes of word-formation, of which three are examples of derivation:
|
Prefixation
(derivational)
|
Suffixation
(derivational)
|
Compounding
(derivational)
|
Conversion
(not derivational)
|
|
Affix placed
before base of word, e.g.disobey
|
Affix placed
after base of word, e.g.kindness
|
Two base
forms are added together, e.g.blackbird
|
Word changes
class, without any change of form, e.g. (the) pet (n)
becomes (to) pet (vb.)
|
Words
considered as wholes can be categorized according to how they work within
phrases, clauses or sentences. These categories, traditionally
called parts of speech are now more usually known as word
classes. Parts of speech are labels for categories in which words
are usually placed. But in a given sentence a word from one category
may behave as if it were in another. A dictionary will only record established
or standard usage.
The traditional
parts of speech were of eight kinds, excluding the two articles (a/an, the).
These were nouns, pronouns, adjectives, verbs, prepositions, conjunctions,
adverbs, and interjections. Modern linguists prefer to list words in classes
that are coherent - all the words in them should behave in the same
way. But if this principle were applied rigidly, we would have hundreds of
classes, so irregularities are tolerated!
Some classes of
words are called closed because they contain a relatively small
number of items to which no new words can normally be added. These are words
(prepositions and conjunctions) which make connections
(connectives or connectors), pronouns and words (including articles)
like the, some, each that co-occur with nouns - these are
calleddeterminers.
Other classes
of word are constantly being added to. Each contains a vast number of terms
already. They are open to new words being introduced. The open
classes are nouns, verbs and the words which qualify them, adjectives and
adverbs. These form the bulk of a language's vocabulary
or lexis (also lexicon, though this sometimes refers to a
published version). These classes may be called lexical whereas the
closed-class words arestructural or functional. These tables illustrate
the two kinds of word class.
|
Determiner
|
Pronoun
|
Preposition
|
Conjunction
|
|
A, the, any,
my, those, which
|
She, them,
who, that, himself
|
In, across,
at, by, near, within
|
And, but, if,
or, while, unless
|
|
Noun
|
Verb
|
Adjective
|
Adverb
|
|
Abstract: fear,
joy
Concrete: chair, mud Common: boy, town Proper: Fred, Hull |
Transitive: bite,
steal
Intransitive: live, cry Modal: can, will, may Auxiliary: be, have, do |
Descriptive: lazy,
tall
Comparative: lazier Superlative: tallest |
Manner: reluctantly,
keenly, easily, softly
Time: soon, often Place: here, there |
Some words are
difficult to classify. Not all grammatical descriptions will place them in the
same word class. This, these or those are sometimes
classified as demonstrative (or distinctive) adjectives or pronouns.
Possessives, like my, his, their, are sometimes classified as pronouns
(showing the word from which they are formed), sometimes as adjectives, showing
their grammatical function of qualifying nouns: usually they are pronouns when
alone (I like that) and adjectives when they precede a noun (I
like thisweather). Traditional lists of adverbs contain words
like very which qualify other adverbs or adjectives. This word class
is sometimes called a "dustbin" class, because any word which defies
classification will be put in it! Among words which have sometimes been
classified as adverbs are the following: however, just, no, not, quickly,
tomorrow and when.
This
incoherence has long been recognized by grammarians who subdivide adverbs into
further categories, such as adverbs of time, place or manner.
In trying to
organize words into coherent classes, linguists will consider any or all of the
following: what they mean (semantics),
their form (morphology), provenance (historical origin)
and function in a phrase, clause or sentence (syntax).
Some words,
such as numbers, do not fit in any of the word classes given above. They can
behave as adjectives (one loaf or two?) or pronouns (I want one now!). And
no onedescription of word classes is regarded as finally authoritative.
Some classes (such asverbs or conjunctions) are fairly coherent. You should be
able to discuss the problems of how or where to classify words which seem not
to "fit".
Also note that
a dictionary does not (or should not) prescribe, but indicates the word
class or part of speech where a word is usually placed. But in a
given sentence, if the speaker or writer has used it as if it were in a
different class, then this is where it should be placed.
For example, toilet is
usually classified as a noun. But UK primary school teachers often speak
of toileting children (I had to toilet John twice today). In
describing such a sentence, you should be guided by the internal grammar of the
sentence (syntax) rather than the dictionary. Here toilet is a
transitive verb. If this usage becomes standard, lexicographers will record it.
This kind of word formation is called conversion, a self-explanatory name.
Every statement
is a combination of words, and every statement says something to communicate
information. The simplest possible kind of statement - for example, Dogs
bark - has two kinds of words in it. It has a what word, dogs,
and a what happens word, bark. These kinds of words are the most
basic parts of any statement. If a person only says dog, no statement is
made, and no information is conveyed. A sound is made that calls to mind a
common, four-footed animal, but nothing regarding it is learned.
The what words
are called nouns. They tell what is being talked about. They are
identifying words, or names. Nouns identify persons, places, or things. They
may be particular persons, places, or things: Michael Jackson, Reykjavik,
World Trade Center. Or they may be general nouns: singer, town,
building. Concrete nouns indicate things that can be seen such as
car, teapot, and potato. Abstract nouns denote concepts such
as love, honesty,and beauty.
It is rather
odd that English grammar should retain this abstract-concrete distinction
for nouns. It appears to be a survival from the philosopher Plato, who divided
the world into mind and matter. If it has any value it is in the philosophical
field of epistemology (theory of knowledge). It does not really reveal anything
for linguists beyond itself. That is, we can, if we wish, try to place nouns in
the sub-categories of concrete and abstract, but once we have done so, this
categorization has no further value for the study of language. Moreover, modern
science confuses the issue, since it shows that many things we once supposed to
belong to mind, are in fact, embodied in matter. A thrill is not only
abstract, since it involves matter at the level of biochemistry.
The what
happens words are called verbs. They are the action words in a
statement. Without them it is impossible to put sentences together. It is the
verb that says something about the noun: dogs bark, birds fly, fish
swim. Verbs are the important words that create information in statements.
Although nouns alone make no statement, verbs can occasionally do
so. Help! gives the information that someone is in trouble,
and Go away!tells someone or something emphatically to leave.
Besides nouns
and verbs there are other kinds of words that have different functions in
statements. They are pronouns, adjectives, adverbs, conjunctions,
articles, prepositions, and a very few words that can be called function
words because they fit into none of the other categories. All of these
kinds of words together are called parts of speech. They can just as well be
called parts of writing because they apply to written as well as to spoken
language.
Nouns can be
particular or general: the house, a house. The
words the and a are articles, or, in more technical terms, determiners. A house can
be any house, but the house is a quite definite building. When a
noun begins with a vowel (a, e, i, o, u, and, occasionally, y) the
indefinite article a becomes an for the sake of easier
pronunciation - an apple, an elephant, an
orange. Sometimes an is used before words that start
with h, especially if theh is silent: an honorary
degree. If the h is sounded a is the standard
form: an 'otel, a hotel.
Nouns can be
singular or plural in number: cat, cats.
- In some
cases es is added to make nouns plural: dress, dresses.
- Some nouns
change their forms in the plural, without adding an s but by
changing ormutating a vowel: foot, feet; man, men; mouse, mice;
goose, geese.
- Some nouns
do not change at all in the plural: sheep, fowl.
There are also
group nouns, called noun phrases. This means that two or more nouns, or a
noun and an adjective, are put together to form what amounts to, or works like,
one noun:football stadium, rock concert, orange tree. In each case certain
nouns - football, rock, orange - are attached to other nouns, and
each modifies or describes the second noun in some way to convey a different
kind of object. A football and a football stadium are two
entirely different things, though they both have to do with the same game.
Some nouns are
one-of-a-kind names: Suez Canal, Elvis Presley, Empire State Building.Also
called proper nouns, they are capitalized to set them off from general
nouns. Sometimes adjectives (words that describe nouns) are also
capitalized. This normally happens when the adjective is made from a proper
noun, especially a place or
person:American literature, English countryside, Elizabethan theatre.
Proper nouns
are contrasted with common nouns (naming words for general classes of things
which contain many individual examples). In fact many of the nouns that we
consider proper are still names for more than one individual, as with the name
of a model of car (likeFord Escort or VW Beetle, which might have
been produced in the millions). Like the abstract-concrete distinction, the
common-proper categories may originate in Platonic philosophy, which contrasted
the many things in the real world with unique ideal originals of which they are
imperfect copies. It is of more practical concern, since it is meant to inform
the written representations of words (whether or not to use an initial
capital). Unlike German (which uses a capital for all nouns) or Norwegian
(which never does), English has a mixed and inconsistent system which changes
over time, and which is confused by the individual tendencies of writers. One
problem is that a descriptive phrase (like the second world war) can
become petrified into a title, so that we write Second World
War or World War Two. And Queen Juliana is or was the queen of
the Netherlands, but Queen Elizabeth II is, to many of her subjects,
simply the Queen, or even The Queen. In these cases, the
"correct" forms are not universally standard for all writers of
English, but more a matter of publishers' house styles.
Many
introductions to English grammar for schoolchildren are to blame for presenting
this common-proper distinction as if it were very straightforward - by
referring only to well-behaved kinds of proper noun, such as personal names or
the names of cities, rivers and planets. In such introductions the distinction
is introduced chiefly to lead onto instruction about the use of capital letters
in writing such nouns.
Nouns are used
in different ways: The dog barks. The man bit the dog. In the first
case, dog is the actor, or the one that initiates the action of the verb. In
the second, dog is acted upon. In The dog barks, dog is
the subject of the verb. In the other sentence, dog is
theobject of the verb.
Sometimes a
noun is the indirect object of a verb: He gave the dog a
bone. Bone is the direct object; it is what was given. Because it was
given to the dog, dog is considered theindirect object
of the action.
Nouns can also
be objects of prepositions - words like to, in,
for, and by - so the above sentence could read: He gave a
bone to the dog. The words to the dog are called aprepositional
phrase.
Some verb forms
take nouns as objects: Drinking milk is good for you. In this
sentence,milk is the object of the verbal form drinking. Such a
combination of verb and noun is called a verbal phrase.
Nouns can show
possession: The dog's collar is on the table. The collar is
possessed, or owned, by the dog. All possession does not indicate ownership,
however. In The building's roof is black, the roof is on, but not
owned by, the building. Adding an apostrophe and an sto a noun shows
possession ('): the cat's tongue, the woman's purse. If the noun is
plural or already has an s, then often only an apostrophe need be
added: the mothers' union (that is, a union of many mothers). The
word of may also be used to show possession: the top of the
house, the light of the candle, the Duke of Wellington.